![bogofilter vs spamassassin bogofilter vs spamassassin](https://www.abclinuxu.cz/images/screenshots/6/5/65221-Evolution-mini-33783.jpg)
Oddly enough the lovely Coach handbag knockoff messages don't seem to make the cut. Im still > using spamassassin and bogofilter 1 these days, but finding more and more > crap in my real inbox, thanks to all this random-text crap.
![bogofilter vs spamassassin bogofilter vs spamassassin](https://www.abclinuxu.cz/images/screenshots/1/2/65221-evolution-mini-8064840389346198275.png)
The pattern I'm noticing is the messages going to "spam" tend to be for mail order insert-ethnicity-here brides and cheap ED meds. Can be integrated with Bogofilter, SpamAssassin, and probably whatever you want for spam filtering. Bogofilter uses a modified version of the bayesian technique, with a number of knobs to tweak. It has evolved over time, and has picked up a wider community of contributors and maintainers. I personally would love to have such a feature available a trained bogofilter is quite a capable antispam tool. This appears to be some kind of local temporary folder. Bogofilter was originally written by Eric Raymond shortly after Paul Graham's article was posted. I checked this with a different machine and Thunderbird as well as the Web interface provided by the email host. This new "spam" folder appears in KMail but does NOT appear on the IMAP server even though KMail shows it in that tree. Other messages go to "spam" not the old "Spam" folder still existing on the server. Relevant releases/architectures: Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder (v. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.
Bogofilter vs spamassassin update#
Some messages go to junk all on their own. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Low. If I right click and apply filter spam things actually go to junk. This is where a client I used to use years ago sent everything and I've just kept up with the tradition so I can always find things when I have to use another machine or the Web interface. please correct me if i got something wrong. bogofilter seems to be a lot faster than spamassassin. as far as i understood bogofilter uses Bayesian filtering while spamassassin uses Bayesian filtering and analyses the mail headers. I went through all of the help and all of the places I could find to change spam filter, which is using spamasassin, to route all spam to IMAP/blah/junk. I installed spamassassin and bogofilter and they work quite well, but I'm wondering if one of them would be sufficient. Update policy set to "don't break my computer"